Andrew Joron’s “The Ruin of Rules: On a Potential Mash-Up of Oulipo and Surrealism”

•January 2, 2019 • Leave a Comment


Lana Turner: A Journal of Poetry and Opinion 11 (2018) is available as a downloadable PDF. Many thanks to Andrew Joron for his review-essay “The Ruin of Rules: On a Potential Mash-Up of Oulipo and Surrealism” (pp. 113-119) that generously considers my latest book Words on Edge (Black Square Editions, 2018).

Pioneer Valley Poetry Festival, Amherst College, October 19-20, 2018

•October 2, 2018 • Leave a Comment

“Conceptualisms in Crisis: The Fate of Late Conceptual Poetry”

•August 10, 2018 • Leave a Comment

The Journal of Modern Literature 41.3 (Spring 2018) includes my article “Conceptualisms in Crisis: The Fate of Late Conceptual Poetry.”

Here’s the abstract:

Conceptual poetry, widely considered to be one of the twenty-first century’s preeminent avant-gardes, is now under attack. Kenneth Goldsmith’s failed performance “The Body of Michael Brown” has thrown conceptualism into crisis—especially in regards to the racial politics of appropriation. Nevertheless, works such as M. NourbeSe Philip’s Zong! and Claudia Rankine’s Citizen show how conceptual techniques can effectively respond to racial traumas. Similarly, Chilean poet Carlos Soto Román’s textual appropriations protest against state-sponsored murder and suggest new modes of political critique from the global South. Moving beyond a North American context and disentangling the conceptualisms of the movement’s most high-profile practitioners from late conceptual projects by writers of color demonstrate how conceptual poetry is not dying, as some claim, but evolving along different lines of lineage.

Find it on Project Muse soon–

from “Transmitting the Vertical Immensity of Coniferous Light”

•August 7, 2018 • 2 Comments

An excerpt from my sequence “Transmitting the Vertical Immensity of Coniferous Light” is today’s selection for the Academy of American Poets’ Poem-a-Day series. Many thanks to Evie Shockley, who is guest editor of the series in August, and to the staff at the Academy.

You can find another section from “Transmitting the Vertical Immensity of Coniferous Light” here.

Police Lineups (Epigraph, 2018)

•July 21, 2018 • 1 Comment

My chapbook Police Lineups has just been released on Epigraph Magazine’s website. Police Lineups is an abecedarian series that, in forcing a linkage between graphemic and social differentiation, puts the formalism of typographical/concrete poetry within a conceptual frame. It is available as a downloadable PDF as well as an embedded slideshow.

from POLICE LINEUPS (Epigraph, 2018)

Thanks to Nicholas Bon for seeing this project through.

Words on Edge (Black Square Editions, 2018) reviewed at Galatea Resurrects

•June 23, 2018 • Leave a Comment

Many thanks to Eileen Tabios for her appreciative words on Words on Edge: “WORDS ON EDGE is…a testament to the freedom and freeing found when one operates within constraints…one might say that WORDS ON EDGE very much reveals its times: a world on edge…Reading the book is a RECOMMENDED path if you appreciate music, humor, and wisdom.” See the full review here.

I’ve been reading and enjoying Eileen’s exquisite Murder Death Resurrection recently out from Dos Madres Press. In its anaphoric use of the phrase “I forgot…” it’s both meandering and moving: “I forgot strolling through streets and seeing their dimensions as Paul Eluard’s measurements: wounds that simply would not close.”

UAlbany’s False Advertising: A Reason to Be Disgusted

•June 1, 2018 • Leave a Comment

The current homepage of the University at Albany, SUNY has a slideshow featuring several marketing blurbs to prospective students. The language of those blurbs is shockingly–and disturbingly–inaccurate. Take, for instance, the university’s statement that “UAlbany’s faculty are focused on one thing: your success.” This claim smacks of Burger King’s “Your Way, Right Away” slogan from the 1990s. The university surely does not mean “tenure track faculty” in using the word “faculty,” because, according to the university’s web page on “Procedures for Promotion and Tenure Review,” “faculty contributions and accomplishments in scholarship, teaching, and service are the vital components of a research university’s success in advancing its mission. The University at Albany is committed to providing an academic climate that supports and facilitates faculty excellence in all three areas.”

It is clear that both statements cannot be correct at the same time. Even though I am a (pre-tenure) faculty member in the humanities my math is good enough to understand that “one thing” cannot be “three areas.” If UAlbany’s faculty members are only focused on student success what does that say about the success of the university’s status as research university? If UAlbany’s administration badgers its faculty into performing institutional service wouldn’t that conflict with the claim that we have a singular focus on teaching? And if the success of whoever “you” is is a faculty member’s sole focus, what might happen when that faculty member’s research is evaluated during tenure review? In any case, I’d like to offer the following creative English-to-English translation. Not: “UAlbany’s faculty are focused on one thing: your success.” But: “UAlbany is focused on one thing: your tuition money.”